Sunday, May 15, 2005

Music: A Kid's Reviews

Shell was checking out the customer reviews of Pink Floyd's "The Wall" over at Amazon. There are a bunch from May headed "A Kid's Review". I would say these were done as a prank. In case they get removed, here's a sampling. (Warning: rated R.)
My friend Joey played this musci to me and said his entire entourage digged it very much Well I think he must be joken really coz I am not impressed.

I think every song is great and I don't believe this music would give a kid nightmares. Dad says that alot altho he is joking.

When I bought this CD I played it to Mandy and she digged it completely. So much as a matter of fact she gave me a bj for thanks. Later I realised she kicked on the fat instrumentations and hoarse vocalisations. Also the subjects of hate and anger and depprivation are always good for drama stories such as this CD. Five stars for sure and the love of Many

a fart is worth a 1000 silverlings more than the music from a sick mind (chinese proverb)

this one takes a while to get used to i really did not like this album untill i heard that if you play the movie Disney's alice in wonder land. Yes it does work. i recomend this album to any one but, to any one who has an open mind and is ready for an adventure of a life tome. i also recomend the rock operas Tommy by the who and Preservation(Acts 1 and 2) by the kinks.

There are none whatsoever good or even decent songs here. None, I tell you. What about Hey Hugh? about Hugh Padgham - it is just a sad and bad song alike the whole cd is sad and bad. Frank Zappa's version of Mothers was kind of fun, but this song Mother is just a silly joke really. The Trail is very very tiring and trite. Another good song is Completely numb, a cover version from the scissors sister song whose version I prefer.

The Who, Kinks and Hugh Padgham references give the game away.

Upon further "review", it appears that Amazon allows children under 13 to review a product without being registered. So anyone can submit "A Kid's Review". This appears to be an effort to comply with the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, which they were accused of violating.

No comments: